Skip to main content

The Lady Sultan

Indian History, or subcontinental History, is incomplete without speaking of the women who left a mark in their own significant ways. The first woman who comes to mind is perhaps the only woman Sultan to rule Delhi, Raziya (Razia).


It’s been over a year since I had been trying to read and understand the mystery of Raziya Bint Iltutmish. Attributed as the only Woman Muslim Monarch of India, she is a name of many assumptions, imagination and speculations. The few books that have been written on her or the historical accounts of the Slave Dynasty mentioning her have always been about the turbulence of the government and the various rebels and uprisings that took place among the prominent chiefs of Iltutmish, who wanted to rise in power. No documentation or portrayal is found about her look, character or early days from her contemporary times. The only relevant historical book I found solely on her was by Dr Karunapada Dutta, while she finds a chapter in Heroines by Ira Mukhoty or The Women Who Ruled India by Archana Gadoria Gupta.




Historically speaking, Raziya came into the spotlight after living a much-secluded life away from the court when her half-brother Rukn Al-Din, whose mother was speculated to be one of Iltutmish’s concubines, tried to kill her. Many historical accounts claim that an ailing Iltutmish chose her to reign over his sons because they were incompetent. She had also worked as his representative between the years 1229 to 1231 at Delhi while he was at war. But no documents back this. In fact, Rukn Al-Din or Rukn Ud Din as he’s called, was being prepared for the throne clearly by his father, because he was already given a larger portion of the kingdom to rule at Lahore. On the contrary, Raziya, like every other girl, was confined to the inner palace. If Iltutmish wanted her on the throne, he would have shown such intentions by making her take part in the administration of the country actively.


Born in 1205 A.D. to the then newly married Princess Qutb Begum and the general of her father’s army, Iltutmish, Razia was an unmarried princess of twenty-nine years when her father died. Why she was not married or engaged remains a mystery. Many of her half-brothers have been mentioned in the battles and rebellions that happened immediately after Iltutmish died. But there is no mention of any sisters or half-sisters of hers. In the imagination of many, she is often portrayed as a fair maiden with doe eyes and high cheekbones. But her appearance and character still remain unknown. When Rukn Ud Din tried to kill her, she stood in front of the powerful chiefs of the country and the army and reminded them of her father’s great services to the nation. She accused her brother and his mother of the murder of their kin, and hence the nobles sided with her. Politically speaking, these nobles were actually very much disturbed by Rukn Ud-Din's over-ambition and will to rule alone, dismissing their importance or opinion and considering Raziya, who was to them an incompetent, inexperienced woman, who could be their puppet on the throne. Many of the orthodox seniors had already shown their displeasure as Raziya had appeared at the court as the newly proclaimed Sultan after settling scores with her kin. In the year 1236, thus, India found its first and only female monarch in Sultan Jalalat Ud Din Raziya.

In her short reign of four years, Raziya proved she was not merely a puppet. She curbed the power of the nobles and made them furious. Her administrative and defensive moves are still praised by modern-day historians. She was an intelligent woman, a good fighter and a compassionate ruler. She gave the forts of Gwalior and Ranthambore back to their Hindu Rulers, giving them respect and importance as well. All these made the chiefs plan a rebellion against her. Furthermore, she had dared to step out of the veil, wear the clothes of a man, and ride the elephant under broad daylight, showing her face to her subjects, and refused to be called “Sultana”, which was a title for queens. These moves by a woman disturbed the orthodox society of the time.  They took her as too independent and reckless, and hence a wrong example to other women in society.

Here we talk about the two men in her life. Jamal Ud Din Yakut was a slave of her father’s who, during Raziya’s reign, had suddenly grown to a lot of power. The chiefs rising against her had created rumours of her affair with him. The story of her affair with Yakut, a princess getting involved with a slave, brought forward disgust from the people about her character and, hence, her competency as a ruler. The purposes of the chiefs were thus served. True or not, it is very clear that during the early days of her reign, she had shown immense trust and faith in Yakut. This man disappeared from the scene either because of the rumours or by war and death, as many opine.

Image result for raziya sultan
One of the tombs claimed to be hers.

The next man we talk about is Malik Altunia, the chief of Bhatinda in present-day Punjab. He had been a chief in favour of Raziya, who was also originally a slave. Later in her reign, he revolted against her and captured her. It was then that Raziya proposed marriage to him and sought his alliance to reclaim her throne at Delhi. Many versions of stories are woven between Altunia and Raziya. Some say they had known each other since her childhood days, during her father’s reign, and the marriage was a reciprocation of their long-lost love, and that he revolted against her, thinking she had a romantic relationship with Yakut. That would explain why she was not engaged or married. Many also claim that Yakut didn’t exist and the whole story was framed later to question her character. Historians like to call the marriage a purely political move by both parties, as Raziya needed his army to claim back her throne from the rebels and Altunia an alliance to stay powerful. After marriage in the year 1239, they headed out to meet the rebellions led by Bahram near Delhi. After retreating to Kaithal, they were eventually killed there on 13th October 1240 A.D.

The burial place of Raziya also remains untraceable. Some claim her tomb is at the Turk Gate of Shahjahanabad, while some say she was buried at Kaithal alongside Altunia, exactly where they fell fighting. Some also say her burial is at Tonk, Rajasthan. No historical documentation validates any of the places as her true burial site.

Now, this is the story we all know. We all read about it, and find names of the people who rebelled against her and also those who helped her. We know her family and their achievements. Be it her maternal grandfather, Qutb Ud Din or her father, Iltutmish. Both rulers record glorious reigns and successful conquests. It is, however, said that Raziya had been a people’s favourite as well. Unlike most of her time, she was tolerant towards her Hindu Subjects and was a good fighter and administrator. In her short reign, she tried to establish that she was no less than a son to her father. Her moves of being called Sultan instead of Sultana and wearing men’s attire to the court were all reflections of this try. Among her brothers, who were actually power hungry and spent most of their time in pleasure, she had on the other hand shown the skills of being an able administrator. She had coins in her name and maintained her own cavalry. Although she is a mystery yet to solve, personally, I feel she is also a woman who rose to power because she had no other option. She served her people because she wanted to survive independently. And she was someone ahead of her time, and the world around her was not ready to accept a female monarch who needed no husband, father or brother as co-regent.
Coins issued in her name are still the only testimony to her short reign as the first independent female ruler in the subcontinent. 

Image result for raziya sultan
Many who followed her as the likes of Noor Jahan, Durgawati, Laxmibai, and others, were all queens and coregents of their husbands or sons, but never independent monarchs. But because of Razia’s move as being called “Sultan,” the other women after her could follow her example and path. Many historians also claim that had she been a man instead, she would have been accepted more openly and her policies and moves less criticised by the orthodox society. Sadly, in the golden pages of history, her name lies hidden in a small paragraph after her father’s glorious reign as the first female monarch. 


Popular posts from this blog

Uttara's Hope

This is part of the "Uttara Series" You will find under the Mahabharata. The series is also available on Wattpad. She was clad in white attire. Her churamani and jewellery were all taken away. She sat numbly in front of his dead body for a whole day, pregnant with his heir, looking at his face as though he was asleep. He had told her more than once that this day could come and that she had to protect their heir. He feared her future without him. That one day turned the fifteen-year-old  Princess of Matsya  into an aged lady. She became quiet and aloof. Her only concern now was her baby. Her baby wiggled in her womb. She remembered him saying,    " I will always be with you." All she wanted now was a son like his father. But she knew all Hastinapur wanted was an heir to the throne. The war had ended five days after his death, and they were back in the palace of Hastinapur victorious. She, for the first time, entered her real in-laws' home, but without him. All sh...

Asuras are not Demons

Demons in the Abrahamic religion are not the same as Asuras of Hinduism. Originally deities of Iranian origin, they were seen in the tribal context as no different from Devas but as counterparts to maintain balance. In early epics and Puranas, asura meant a chosen leader of great capacity. Only later, perhaps due to the Iranian link, their image declined. It was with the Brahmanas that the sharp divide appeared: devas as divine, asuras as evil. Puranic myths demonised them mainly to assert the superiority and immortality of devas, while asuras were cast as symbols of the "other." Since Tribes still worshipped them and embraced their power of negativity, being important to balance, they soon became synonymous with tribes, which was not the case mythologically. There are instances of Bali or Ravana being Kshatriya or Brahmin Asuras and competent kings. Indian demonology itself is vast and layered, shaped by surviving tribes, each with unique myths. Celestial, aerial, and terres...

Maharana Pratap: The Sun of Mewar

Many of you have read my fan fiction as well as historical representations of the life and times of Maharana Pratap Singh of Mewar. I provided small details of his life in many articles. But never have I ever made a separate historical post on him. It is very difficult to put together his life without the help of folklore because historical evidence is scarce. This one was requested, and hence here it goes. Needless to say, this one is very special. This is a blend of history and folklore. Leave your love.  ❤️ Background and Birth: The year was 1540. Mewar was under a cloud of uncertainty. Banbir, their ruler for four years now, was a very incompetent ruler who always spent his time in luxury, drinking and dancing with girls. The crown prince Udai Singh was rumoured to have been killed by him. Chittorgarh was in darkness. Around March 1540, Mewar once again saw hope as some trusted generals, along with Kunwar Udai Singh, attacked Chittorgarh, taking Banbir by surprise. He was soon ...

Nawab E Bengal

  Background: Nawab Alivardi Khan was ruling Bengal at the peak of Nawabi rule, expanding his strong empire. He had successfully suppressed the Marathas and had given a strong message to the British East India Company’s rising influence at Calcutta. Highly aware of the British Colonial policies across the globe, Nawab Alivardi Khan was strict with his policies and stronghold over Murshidabad, the then capital of Bengal (including present-day Bihar, Jharkhand, West Bengal, Orissa, and Bangladesh).  He had two daughters and no sons. Amina Begum was the elder one, followed by Ghaseti Begum. Amina had three sons with her husband and courtier, Ahmed Khan. The second son, Mirza Mohammad, fondly called Siraj-Ud-Daulah (light of the country)by his grandfather, was born in 1733C.E. He was his grandfather’s  favourite  because he was born while he won over the Marathas. Alivardi Khan never let the “fortune child” of the family out of his sight. Siraj grew up accompanying his g...

Rakhi Tales

The year was 1535 CE. The Rajmata of Mewar, widow of Rana Sanga, was in a dilemma. On one hand was an attack from Bahadur Shah of Gujarat as a threat to her capital, Chittorgarh, and the throne of her beloved teenage son Vikramaditya. On the other hand, there was the son of her husband's archenemy, Humayun, who could be of some help. Rani Karnavati wrote a letter to Humayun, who was in the east at that time. Along with it, she sent a Rakhi, a thread of brotherhood, asking him, as a sister, for protection against the enemy. But the road was too long and time, of great essence. Humayun arrived at Chittorgarh, in response to her letter, keeping his end of the bargain but a little late. Rani Karnavati had already performed the Jauhar. They never met. Humayun established Rana Vikramaditya on the throne of Mewar, as he had promised as a brother, and returned to his post. Two dynasties, political rivals and sworn enemies, from Sanga-Babur to Pratap-Akbar and even Raj Singh-Aurangzeb, yet ...

Sisodiya: Kings, Queens and Princes (1538 - 1597)

I am back with another History post, this time it is on the wives and sons of Rana Udai Singh II of Mewar, his son and heir Maharana Pratap and Rana Amar Singh. This is a continuation of the Sisodia Family History I posted some time back. The information has been taken from Annals of Mewar by James Todd, Maharana Pratap by B.N. Rana, and Maharana Pratap by Rima Hooja.  Udai Singh II  was the son of Ranisa Karnawati and Rana Sangram Singh. He was born on 4th August 1 522, at Chittorgarh and died on 28th February 1 572 at Gogunda . He was the Ruler of the Sisodia Dynasty. He is believed to have  56 sons and 2 5 wives, apart from the many insignificant queens in his Rani Mahal. Here is a list of his main queens and their sons. Maharani Jaivanta Bai Songara of Jalore  was his chief queen and consort. Her son is Maharana Pratap. He was married to her before he went to war with Banbir, as her father, Akshayraj Rao, was a friend and ally of his father, Rana Sanga.  Saj...

Prithviraj Chauhan: A Saga

Note: This piece is a work of fiction based on folklore and the Prithviraj Raso, an epic saga by Chand Bardai, who happened to be the court poet of Prithviraj Chauhan. The dates corresponding to wars, names of people and places are, however, historically fact-checked from various sources, including the works of Todd (semi-historical), The  Amir Khusrau and contemporary sources like R.C.Majumder. The incidents are fictionally woven. Rai Pithora Around the year 1140 A.D., Ajmer was ruled by Anangpal of the Tomara Dynasty. Delhi was the seat of power of the Sultanate, which was a constant power struggle for them. He managed to capture briefly most parts of west Rajputana, and present-day Haryana and Punjab were also part of his kingdom. The old king had a son and two daughters. His concern grew as his son Surya was not talented enough to rule Ajmer. His youngest daughter, Princess Karpuri Devi, was married to Someshwar Chauhan of the famous Chauhan clan. Their son, Rai Pithora, helped...

Rani Padmini: The Valiant Queen

This story is a retelling of some parts of Malik Mohammad Jayasi's Padmavat, which was a historical fiction poem written in 1540, an odd 200 years after the siege of Chittorgarh by Allauddin Khilji. Historically, the Rajputs of Mewar didn't keep accounts of their queens, even by name, so the name Padmini or Padmavati was made up by Jayasi to represent the women of Chittor who chose the Jauhar. Historically speaking, Allauddin Khilji wanted the trade route to Surat for himself, which went through Mewar and Rana Ratan Singh, a patron of art, was not known for his military skills. So when Khilji surrounded the fort, the only way out was the Saka and Jauhar. Rani Padmini's Jauhar, as it is now popularly called, is also not the first Jauhar Khilji witnessed. The Jauhars of Ranthambore and Jaisalmer happened before he attacked Chittorgarh. Also, the act of Jauhar happened as early as the Greek invasions of Porus's state, when it is described as the "Mass immolation of Sa...

The Emperor's First Wife

  Ruqaiya Sultana Begum  was born to Babur's second surviving son, Hindal Mirza, and his wife, Sultanam Begum, in 1542 C.E., merely a few months after Hamida Banu gave birth to the heir Jalaluddin Mohammad Akbar. She was well-versed in Persian, Urdu and Arabic and was attracted to poetry and music. Being a proud descendant of the Timurid clan, most of Rukaiya's childhood was spent in Kabul, near the Bagh E Babur, built by Babur himself. From early childhood, she had seen the struggle of her family to regain their lost power in Hind. In 1551 C.E., just after her father died young at a battle for Humayun, leaving her and her mother in the harem of the emperor, it was Hamida Banu who wanted the marriage of Rukaiya to her first cousin, Akbar. Theirs was the first in-house marriage of the Mughals, soon to be followed by many more in the generations to come. At the mere age of nine, she had married the crown prince, and when Humayun won back Lahore, she was fifteen. At the mere age ...

Mewar: Origin of Guhilots

Origin: Lord Rama had two sons,  Labh  and  Kush . The Ranas of Mewar are descendants of the former. Labh had built his capital at  Lah-Kot (Lahore) , and the branch from which the Mewar blue blood arrives resided there until  Kanaksen  (Often traced as the founder)moved to  Dwarika, Saurashtra.  "Sen" was used as a title term for many decades by this Suryavanshi clan until it later changed to "Dit" or "Aditya", names of the Sun. Aditya was changed to Guhilot permanently after the expulsion from Saurashtra when they settled in the  Ahar  valleys (Aravallis). The  Sisodia  clan sprang from a Prince of Chittoor who had killed a hard chase hare (sissoo in local dialect). The branch often used " Ranawat ", meaning "Royal Blood", as a title, but over time, Sisodia emerged as the retained branch name. Kanaksen wrestled dominance of the Parmar race and founded  Birnagar  in AD 144. Four generations hence,  Vijay Sen ...