For a good amount of time now, I have been witnessing history pages popping up in the light of politics and religion claiming to be "researchers" (which is an insult to researchers who spend their entire life in reading and understanding history and have degrees) and people actually believing every word that these pages, websites and people say. So here is my own brief understanding of how to actually "read" history. 1. Find a topic (can be an event, a person, a dynasty) 2. Look up popular writers on the topic. (Check out their international recognitions, degrees and area of expertise) 3. Look up books with good reviews. 4. Pick your book. Make sure it has a reference and a Bibliography given. 5. Cross-check facts with the references given. Read up on the books given in the bibliography. 6. Repeat steps 4 and 5 for the next book. 7. If you are reading about dynasties, make sure you read their contemporary accounts, in the earliest possible translation and modern tr...
The Indian Subcontinent is a diverse mix of cultures, religions and traditions that make up its value system. The moment we discuss the early Indian subcontinent and its religions, long before Buddhism or Jainism came into existence or the Abrahamic religions were introduced on the western coasts by travellers and traders, long before any invasion proved any sign of forced conversion, a layman’s idea of the Indian Subcontinent is that of a single unified culture. Historically speaking, that is far from the truth. The Indian Subcontinent, since the evidence of early civilisation has been found in its river banks, like that in Bhirrana or Mehrgarh, dating back to around 6000 BCE, has never had one unifying belief through its geographic boundaries. The terms Hindu, Hindustan and many others come originally from attributed to primary sources of the Ancient West Asian civilisation. But our history starts much earlier than that. And where there is society and civilisation, there is bound to ...